All English Classes to Be In English. Really.
I'm becoming a big fan of Korea Beat. These are the timely articles that you just don't get in the Korean English dailies.
I've heard rumors of the Lee Myung-bak's transition team proposing that high school Science and Math classes by 2010. That is just insane. These guys are just talking crazy after being locked in a room for a couple weeks brainstorming wonderful policy moves. However, I haven't seen this printed yet, so I don't really believe it (yet).
The proposal detailed in this post, namely that English teachers will have to teach in English and students will be required to take tests focused more on communication than grammar knowledge, seems reasonable. Can you imagine having a language teacher who couldn't communicate passably (note I don't say well) in the target language? This is certainly the case with many English teachers in Korea. It is my impression that the numbers are greatest in the elementary schools and decrease in middle schools and then again in high schools.
I understand being afraid of change and, thus, the resistance from some teachers (noted in the article). However, I also think that the good of the student must come before the good of the teacher. If you don't know your topic well enough to teach it, you should either learn it or change your teaching responsibilities.
Regardless of what I think here, though. History shows that many of these suggested changes never make it to the policy stage and of those that do, few last. Just think about it. By the time it is enacted and the grace period ends, this presidency will be nearly over. No re-election for Korean presidents. The political will and juice just won't be great enough to make it last.
Dan
Saturday, January 26, 2008
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
Scarcity of Native English Speakers Drives Up Salaries : Korea Beat
Scarcity of Native English Speakers Drives Up Salaries
My feelings on this article (thanks to Korea Beat for the translation) are mixed. My first reaction was, "GOOD". I love higher salaries :) However, after reading it I have other concerns.
These requirements are going to drive away qualified teachers who can go elsewhere, which leaves more unqualified folks who are willing to wait to get in. Though I am in favor of reform, let's face it, most of these regulations won't stop 99% of the undesirables. These new regulations are futile, because most pedophiles haven't been caught, most recreational drug users can stop for a couple weeks to beat the test, and the interviewers will have no clue what to look for (I guarantee that they have had NO training for this). I think that the drug test and background checks are reasonable, but provide another way to interview it if has to be done. The goal should be a system that enables people to come a month after signing a contract. This is best for the workers and for the hagwons.
Another problem is that this might keep bad teachers at their jobs. With easier access to teachers, owners could release bad teachers and bring someone else in with little extra cost. Now, these same teachers are more likely to keep their jobs no matter what their behavior (we've all heard the horror stories, right?).
Though there are certainly problems, a shortage might be a silver lining. A "native" teacher shortage could fuel change initiatives. Better training for Korean English teachers is a great start. I've met middle school English teachers who couldn't even communicate with me. My Korea was as good as their English, which is really, really bad.
Check out the article for more specifics.
Dan
My feelings on this article (thanks to Korea Beat for the translation) are mixed. My first reaction was, "GOOD". I love higher salaries :) However, after reading it I have other concerns.
These requirements are going to drive away qualified teachers who can go elsewhere, which leaves more unqualified folks who are willing to wait to get in. Though I am in favor of reform, let's face it, most of these regulations won't stop 99% of the undesirables. These new regulations are futile, because most pedophiles haven't been caught, most recreational drug users can stop for a couple weeks to beat the test, and the interviewers will have no clue what to look for (I guarantee that they have had NO training for this). I think that the drug test and background checks are reasonable, but provide another way to interview it if has to be done. The goal should be a system that enables people to come a month after signing a contract. This is best for the workers and for the hagwons.
Another problem is that this might keep bad teachers at their jobs. With easier access to teachers, owners could release bad teachers and bring someone else in with little extra cost. Now, these same teachers are more likely to keep their jobs no matter what their behavior (we've all heard the horror stories, right?).
Though there are certainly problems, a shortage might be a silver lining. A "native" teacher shortage could fuel change initiatives. Better training for Korean English teachers is a great start. I've met middle school English teachers who couldn't even communicate with me. My Korea was as good as their English, which is really, really bad.
Check out the article for more specifics.
Dan
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
YouTube - Did You Know 2.0
YouTube - Did You Know 2.0
I'm likely behind on promoting this video, but better late than never. It isn't a new message, but it's a great new way to present the message.
What is the message, you ask? It's that our approach to education (and policies across the board) need to change in order to compete in the 21st Century. Education needs to stay ahead of the change instead of consistently lagging behind.
We, as a global society, need to consider not only how our physical neighbors will fare in this change, but how the rest of the increasingly connected world will as well. I'm weaving in my personal interpretation here, but I have a feeling that the producers would agree.
Enjoy.
Dan
I'm likely behind on promoting this video, but better late than never. It isn't a new message, but it's a great new way to present the message.
What is the message, you ask? It's that our approach to education (and policies across the board) need to change in order to compete in the 21st Century. Education needs to stay ahead of the change instead of consistently lagging behind.
We, as a global society, need to consider not only how our physical neighbors will fare in this change, but how the rest of the increasingly connected world will as well. I'm weaving in my personal interpretation here, but I have a feeling that the producers would agree.
Enjoy.
Dan
Sunday, January 13, 2008
YouTube - People in Order (correct version)
YouTube - People in Order (correct version)
This is a fun video. While not easy, this is the type of video that your students could do and learn quite a lot from.
Dan
This is a fun video. While not easy, this is the type of video that your students could do and learn quite a lot from.
Dan
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
